|
|
Brian Sims
Editor |
| Home> | Fire | >Alarms and Detection | >Wellingborough hotel fined £75,000 for fire safety failures |
| Home> | Fire | >Fire and Rescue | >Wellingborough hotel fined £75,000 for fire safety failures |
| Home> | Fire | >Legislation | >Wellingborough hotel fined £75,000 for fire safety failures |
Wellingborough hotel fined £75,000 for fire safety failures
06 November 2025
THE HIND Hotel in Wellingborough town centre has been handed a £75,000 fine for ignoring an Enforcement Notice issued by Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service to improve its fire safety measures.

Members of the Fire and Rescue Service’s dedicated protection team found fire safety deficiencies during an inspection of the Grade II-listed premises on 21 May, which was conducted as part of a regular programme of visits to premises across the county.
On the day of the visit, the protection team’s officers found that the fire alarm system was faulty and may have been so dating back to 2021. As a result, an Enforcement Notice was served requiring the owner to rectify the faults.
At a follow-up inspection of the Sheep Street premises on 10 September last year, it was discovered that the hotel had failed to comply with the required actions in the Enforcement Notice. As such, Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service took the decision to prosecute the business.
Sentencing details
Sentencing took place at Wellingborough Magistrates’ Court on 4 November. Hind Wellingborough Limited was charged with breaching fire safety legislation. Marcus Holden, sole director of the company, had pleaded guilty on behalf of the defendant at a hearing conducted on 29 July this year.
Subsequently, the company was ordered to pay a £75,000 fine, as well as costs of £4,200 and a victim surcharge totalling £2,000.
Held to account
Scott Richards, head of protection at Northamptonshire Fire and Rescue Service, said: “We work very hard with businesses across the county to make sure that their premises meet the highest standards so they can ensure the safety of their customers and staff.”
Richards continued: “On this occasion, we gave the company every opportunity to rectify its fire alarm system, but it didn’t take any action to address these issues when we served the Enforcement Notice.”
In conclusion, Richards noted: “We never take the decision to prosecute a business lightly. We hope that the sentencing of this premises serves as a reminder that, should businesses choose to put their customers at risk, then we will take clear and decisive action to hold them to account for failing to keep people safe.”
- Foundation supports companies against cyber threats
- Working Group brings forward proposals for regulation of building control profession
- Fire Doors: Assessing The Benefits of Bi-Directional Fire Testing
- EFT Systems partners with Skills for Security
- ICO raises facial recognition concerns
- Remit for CROSS-UK expanded to encompass reporting on fire safety
- Making the grade
- IFE hosts key discussion workshop on future of fire risk assessments
- Government update outlines “sensitive” plans for Grenfell Tower site
- Unmissable event









