Mr Krishnan (a director of Walpole House Limited who also operated a separate sole trader business providing sleeping accommodation at the premises) was prosecuted in relation to his sole trader business. He was fined £1,480 and ordered to pay a £592 surcharge. Mr Kishnan also pleaded guilty to seven offences under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005.

The prosecution followed an inspection that uncovered significant deficiencies in the fire safety arrangements at the premises. The seriousness of the failings led fire safety inspectors from Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service to serve a Prohibition Notice preventing the use of the premises for sleeping accommodation until the necessary remedial works had been completed.

The case came to light after a referral from the local authority.

Serious deficiencies

Fire safety inspectors visited the premises in August 2024 and identified a number of serious fire safety deficiencies. These included:

*the lack of a fire risk assessment

*the absence of an installed fire alarm system

*inadequate emergency lighting provision and a lack of regular maintenance of existing provisions

*incomplete fire doors throughout the premises

*inadequate evacuation procedures

*no firefighting equipment

These deficiencies raised significant concerns about the safety of those individuals sleeping at the premises, particularly so in terms of their ability to receive an adequate warning of a fire and to escape the premises on a safe basis.

As stated, Walpole House Limited and Mr Krishnan both pleaded guilty to seven offences under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005.

The offences related to failures to meet legal requirements concerning:

*Article 8 – General fire precautions: Failure to take appropriate general fire precautions to ensure the safety of relevant persons

*Article 9 – Fire risk assessment: Failure to carry out a suitable and sufficient assessment of fire risks

*Article 11 – Fire safety arrangements: Failure to establish adequate arrangements to plan, organise, control, monitor and review fire safety measures

*Article 13 – Fire detection, warning and firefighting equipment: Failure to ensure the premises were equipped, to the appropriate extent, with suitable fire detection and alarm systems and appropriate firefighting equipment

*Article 14 – Emergency routes and exits: Failure to ensure adequate means of escape in the event of fire (including appropriate fire doors and emergency lighting)

*Article 15 – Fire safety procedures: Failure to establish, implement and communicate appropriate procedures to be followed in the event of serious and imminent danger

*Article 17 – Maintenance: Failure to ensure that fire safety measures were appropriately maintained and kept in efficient working order and good repair

Legal responsibility

Fire safety inspector Tony Hickey, who investigated the case on behalf of Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service, said: “Fire safety is not optional. Anyone providing sleeping accommodation has a legal responsibility to ensure that appropriate fire safety measures are in place in order to protect the lives of those staying at their premises.”

Hickey continued: “The failures identified in this case are serious. The prosecution demonstrates that Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service will take enforcement action where and when those individuals and organisations responsible fail to meet their legal obligations. The consequences of inadequate fire safety can be devastating. Compliance must never be treated as an afterthought.”

Reinforcing the message, Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service will continue to take appropriate enforcement action where those responsible for premises fail to meet their fire safety obligations, in turn helping to protect the public from the risks posed by inadequate fire safety arrangements.

*Further information is available online at www.dsfire.gov.uk

The latest statistics issued by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, covering the year ending March 2026, confirm what many practitioners in the sector have been observing on the ground. The total number of fires attended by Fire and Rescue Services in England rose by 5.8% on the previous year to reach a figure of 641,227. Building fires also increased in the same period by 3.1%. While fire-related fatalities have decreased by 9.3% to 254, they are now 7.2% higher than five years ago.

These are not numbers to be explained away by a hot summer or a statistical anomaly. The underlying figures represent a genuine upward trend in primary fires that result in fatalities we must investigate when it comes to the human cost of fire. A growing trend in fire attendance time is also not a good indicator as we’ve long demonstrated a strong link between that and arresting the growth of fire in many building types.

Within the overall picture, the industrial fire story is particularly troubling. The underlying data points to two fatalities and 135 casualties across 1,806 industrial fires in the period under examination. The casualty figure has nearly doubled since the previous year and is now at a level we’ve not seen since 2018.

It’s a figure that should give any commercial building owner pause for thought. These are not the spectacular, headline-consuming warehouse infernos that occasionally make the national news, yet the data highlights that, for industrial premises, this past financial year has been one of the toughest on record for recorded casualties.

The data should generate a pause to consider whether there’s a change or a trend here that needs attention. Many of the fires fall into the range of what the sector might once have called ‘routine incidents’. The fires we documented earlier this year in Sutton Bonington, Bradford and Widnes involving industrial waste, rubber and recycling material drew little national attention precisely because there were no fatalities. However, each required resources from multiple counties, displaced operations and left environmental questions that communities continued to live with long after the fire crews departed.

Cost behind the figures

The financial cost of those casualties is impossible to calculate, but the scale of physical damage gives some indication. The statistics don’t directly publish an average damage figure for industrial premises, but the underlying data shows that average fire damage area has also risen during the period to 150 m².

Remember that’s across 1,806 fires, in turn meaning the total damage to industrial fires across the period would be equivalent to somewhere in the region of 40 football pitches in terms of area.

Coupled with the casualty figures, there’s a pause to consider the total impact. The true cost of an industrial fire is rarely captured in a single number. There’s the physical damage, the loss of stock, the disruption, the impact on supply chains, the clean-up costs, the regulatory scrutiny that follows and, in some cases, the loss of the business altogether.

These costs sit alongside the human toll. Taken together, they paint a picture that should be making commercial building owners consider the potential impact of a fire and perhaps policy-makers to consider the economic impact.

The question that follows from the statistics is the one that never seems to be asked loudly enough: ‘Why are the figures rising?’ Industrial fire risk has not fundamentally changed. Buildings are better understood, fire regulations exist and the Fire and Rescue Service is well-trained.

What has changed is the scale and complexity of these industrial premises, driven by the growth of e-commerce, the expansion of waste and recycling operations and the increasing use of lithium-ion batteries across logistics and manufacturing spaces. The types of fuels have changed as we’ve moved to the use of more plastics in general handling and containers.

These are new and compounding risks being introduced into a stock of buildings that was never considered to accommodate them and, in many cases, still lacks the most effective tool available to contain their consequences.

Credible tool exists

The statistics tell us the challenge is rising. Attendance time on-site increasing towards ten minutes is coupled with concerns from the Fire and Rescue Service around available water supplies. These are not positive signals. We know that they have an impact on effective and prompt intervention to control a fire.

One potential solution is proven and available. For industrial premises, we know that sprinkler systems have been proven to contain, control or extinguish fires in 99% of cases when activated. They’ve demonstrated their ability to protect people. That’s why they’re used to protect high-rise living spaces.

Any fire stopped in minutes doesn’t burn for ten days, doesn’t generate thousands of litres of contaminated run-off and doesn’t end careers or companies. The gap between the potential outcomes is a policy choice. It’s one that the industry and Government need to confront with far more urgency than the current figures would seem to suggest.

Tom Roche is Secretary of the Business Sprinkler Alliance (www.business-sprinkler-alliance.org)

The new requirement will come into effect on 1 June next year and is designed to ensure that fire sprinkler installers maintain current knowledge, technical competence and awareness of relevant legislation and industry Best Practice throughout their careers.

Under the new requirements, experienced workers will no longer be able to renew their SKILLcard solely on the basis of existing qualifications and standard Health and Safety testing. Applicants will need to successfully complete a verified and industry approved refresher qualification together with a short accredited Continuing Professional Development programme before submitting their renewal application.

Primary aim

“Our primary aim is to ensure that every cardholder has access to up-to-date knowledge of relevant legislation, regulations and industry Best Practice,” explained Ruth Oliver (head of training at ABFSA). “Introducing a structured refresher programme provides a consistent approach to maintaining competence and supports the high standards expected across the fire sprinkler industry.”

Jill Nicholls, director of competence and compliance at the Building Engineering Services Association (BESA), stated: “Competence cannot simply be demonstrated once and then assumed. It needs to be maintained as standards, regulations and working practices evolve.”

Nicholls continued: “We’ve been pleased to work with BAFSA through SKILLcard to support this important change. It will help experienced fire sprinkler installers in keeping their knowledge current and provide a clear way for them to demonstrate ongoing competence and compliance, ultimately helping to strengthen standards across this critical sector.”

Transition framework

BAFSA and SKILLcard have jointly established a transition framework to give employers and installers sufficient time to understand and meet the new requirements before they become mandatory.

Importantly, a six-month notice period is being provided ahead of the new requirements coming into effect.

Installers whose cards expire after 1 June 2027 are encouraged to review the new renewal criteria as soon as possible and plan their training accordingly.

Prerequisites for refresher training

In order to enrol on the new refresher training, installers must:

*hold an appropriate foundational qualification, such as the Level 2 Certificate in Fire Sprinkler Installation
*hold a current Health and Safety certificate that has been completed within the previous two years

The training required as part of the new renewal process is already available through the BAFSA e-Learning portal. The required programmes are:

*ABBE Level 2 Award: Application of Legislation and Regulations in Fire Sprinkler Installations

*Principles and Practices of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems CPD Programme

Both elements are required for the new renewal process.

*Further information is available online at www.bafsa.org.uk

As the independent regulator for the Building Control profession in England and Wales, the Building Safety Regulator is directly responsible for maintaining professional standards and public confidence in the profession.

For their part, disciplinary panels play an important role in considering cases where concerns have been raised about the conduct of registered building inspectors or registered Building Control approvers.

In order to support this work, the Building Safety Regulator is seeking applications from legally qualified professionals, registered building inspectors and experienced lay members to serve on its disciplinary panels.

Each three-person panel brings together legal, technical and independent perspectives to ensure decisions made as part of the disciplinary process are always robust, balanced and fair.

Panels consider cases referred to them and determine whether professional conduct requirements have been met and, where appropriate, whether any sanction should be imposed. Sanctions can include suspension or the cancellation of registrations.

About the roles

The Building Safety Regulator is currently recruiting for all three positions on these panels:

Legally qualified chairs and disciplinary officers

Each panel requires an authorised solicitor or barrister in England and Wales to chair disciplinary panels, provide legal advice and draft concise written decisions and orders.

These individuals will also act as disciplinary officers, assessing alleged misconduct cases on paper to determine if they require a panel hearing.

Registered building inspectors

The Building Safety Regulator is seeking practising front line professionals from the public and private sectors alike to provide crucial peer-led technical expertise.

Applicants must be registered building inspectors at Class 2 or above and regularly carry out restricted activities.

Lay members

Lay members bring an independent perspective and help to ensure that proceedings are fair, transparent and maintain public confidence.

Applicants should have experience of decision-making, governance, professional regulation, tribunal proceedings, investigations, complaints handling or similar fields. A background in Building Control is not required.

Depending on the specific role, panel members can expect a time commitment of eight-to-ten days per annum. Members will receive a daily remuneration rate along with reimbursement for reasonable travel and subsistence expenses. Inductions and ongoing training will also be provided.

Fundamental to safety

Charlie Pugsley, acting CEO at the Building Safety Regulator, said: “The integrity of the Building Control profession is fundamental to the new regulatory framework under the Building Safety Act 2022. This integrity is needed so that construction projects of all sizes and uses can meet strict safety, structural and environmental standards.”

Pugsley continued: “By bringing together strong legal minds, front line registered building inspectors and experienced lay members, our disciplinary panels will ensure that enforcement, if needed, is always fair, transparent and highly effective.”

In conclusion, Pugsley commented: “We urge dedicated professionals across these fields to apply and help shape the future of the profession. This will ensure essential safety standards can be upheld to protect anyone who lives, visits or works in buildings across England and Wales.”

For more information about the roles and how to apply (by the deadline of 11.59 pm on 15 November) visit Building Safety Regulator Disciplinary Panel Recruitment – Building Safety Regulator – Citizen Space

Read more about the panels operated by the Building Safety Regulator: 

*BSR Disciplinary Panels Recruitment - Making Buildings Safer

*Building Safety Regulator Disciplinary Panels – GOV.UK:

*Code of conduct for Disciplinary Panel Members 

*Conflict of Interest Policy for Disciplinary Panel Members 

*Disciplinary Panel Conduct and Complaints Procedure

The Felixstowe-based company’s range of fire-rated loft ladders and hatches includes basic timber loft ladders as well as heavy-duty commercial solutions that offer up to 120 minutes’ worth of fire protection.

In point of fact, the business (which also operates from a sales office located in Worcester) carefully selects the best loft and roof access products available from a range of European manufacturers to suit diverse performance criteria.

For example, Premier Loft Ladders offers a heavy-duty and fire-rated loft ladder that not only offers 30 minutes of fire protection, but is also Passive House certified. Further, many of the company’s fire-rated solutions can be made-to-measure with a range of different features and accessories (including operability from above, the addition of security locks and even fully automatic electric operation).

Products in Premier Loft Ladders’ range of fire-rated loft and roof access solutions (encompassing concertina loft ladders, vertical/wall access ladders and flat roof solutions) are manufactured to EN 14975 standards and have continued to expand during the 20-plus years that the company has been operating in the industry. So too has the level of in-house knowledge and experience on offer.

Architects, specifiers and other industry professionals are encouraged to contact Premier Loft Ladders and discuss their specific requirements during the early stages of any given project.

*Further information is available online at www.premierloftladders.co.uk

Running under the theme ‘From Reaction to Prediction: the Next Paradigm of Electronic Fire Safety’, the Forum will examine how new risks, technologies and regulations are changing the way in which fires are detected and responded to when they occur.

Central to the programme is answering the question as to how fire detection can evolve from identifying the physical signs of an already developing fire towards earlier and more intelligent detection of emerging risks.

Challenges and trends

The programme reflects the breadth of that transition. Following the opening address by Euralarm president Peter Mita, Chantal Chalouhi of Jensen Hughes will examine current challenges and trends in European fire safety.

Robert Read (head of European sales at Apollo Fire Detectors) is then going to explore the limits of today’s smoke, heat and carbon monoxide detection, while Sebastian Festag of Euralarm will address the continuing challenge of false alarm prevention.

Other sessions are scheduled to examine remote services and self-testing, sustainability, computer vision and Edge Artificial Intelligence (AI), sensor fusion and predictive fire safety in addition to early gas detection associated with lithium-ion battery incidents.

The Forum concludes by examining an equally important question: ‘Can regulation, standards and certification can keep pace with innovation in fire detection?’

Intelligent response

Peter Mita commented: “The future of fire detection will not be defined by one technology alone. It will depend on how we combine better sensing, AI, new service models and reliable standards in order to detect developing risks earlier and respond more intelligently.”

Mita added: “Moving from reaction to prediction is not simply a technology discussion. It’s a challenge for the entire fire safety ecosystem. The European Fire Detection Forum brings together the different perspectives needed to address that challenge.”

The European Fire Detection Forum is designed to bring together manufacturers, fire safety engineers and consultants, building owners and facility managers, installers and system integrators, regulators, certification and testing bodies, Fire and Rescue Services, researchers and technology innovators.

Booking details

As stated, the Forum will be held (in English) on 2 December at the Congress-Centrum Ost, Koelnmesse in Cologne. Each conference ticket also provides access to the two-day VdS-Fire Safety Cologne 2026, enabling participants to combine the Forum with a visit to the international fire protection trade fair.

Tickets are priced at €395 plus VAT. This includes conference documentation, refreshments and lunch.

The complete programme (including details of the speakers, session descriptions and registration information) is available in the European Fire Detection Forum flyer on the Euralarm website

*Further information is available online at www.euralarm.org

Following on from the success of the inaugural IFSM Awards in 2025, the event returned for its second year, bringing together fire safety professionals, industry leaders, organisations and IFSM members alike in order to recognise the individuals and businesses making an exceptional contribution to fire safety.

The ceremony celebrated excellence across seven award categories, duly recognising professional achievement, innovation, leadership and dedication to improving fire safety standards.

The evening was hosted by Jon Briggs, famously known as the original UK voice of Siri, who guided guests through the awards ceremony. Entertainment was provided by comedian Josh Daniels, who brought plenty of laughter to the occasion, alongside live musical performances from talented singer Dylan Dale.

With 191 guests in attendance, the event provided an opportunity for members of the fire safety community to join forces, celebrate their achievements and recognise the dedication and hard work taking place throughout the profession.

IFSM Awards 2026: The Winners

The winners of the various categories for the IFSM Awards 2026 are as follows:

*Accredited Course of the Year: Fike Safety Technology

*Fire Safety Company of the Year: Global HSE Group

*Fire Safety Team of the Year (pictured, above): Torus62

*Fire Safety Project of the Year: Fire Protection Association

*Fire Safety Manager of the Year: Ben Duggan

*Young Fire Professional of the Year: Oliver Hamblett

*Fire Safety Professional of the Year: Colin Todd MBE

Each award recognises exceptional achievement and the important contribution made by individuals, teams and organisations towards improving fire safety standards and protecting lives and property.

The IFSM Awards were established to celebrate the achievements of those working tirelessly to advance the fire safety profession, while providing an opportunity to recognise both established industry leaders and emerging talent.

The Institute is delighted by the support received from members, nominees, sponsors and guests, whose involvement helped to make the second annual ceremony a memorable occasion.

Recognition for dedication

Dave White, chair and managing director of the IFSM, informed Fire Safety Matters: “We were absolutely delighted with the turnout for our second IFSM Awards and would like to extend our congratulations to all of this year’s winners, finalists and nominees.”

White continued: “The reason why we hold these awards is to shine a spotlight on our members and recognise the incredible hard work, dedication and achievements that can so often go unnoticed. In our industry, doing a good job often means that nothing happens. Fires are prevented, incidents are avoided and, most importantly, people are kept safe. That’s something we should never take for granted, and it’s exactly why recognising the people behind that work is so very important.”

In conclusion, White stated: “We are incredibly proud of our members and everything they contribute to the fire safety profession. It was fantastic to bring everyone together to celebrate their achievements and we’re already looking forward to doing it all again next year.”

*Further information is available online at www.ifsm.org.uk

Upwards of 6,000 companies were contacted to take part in the Trade Association’s third annual survey of the industry’s response to the Act of Parliament, the results if which have revealed that awareness is now widespread. Most firms (64% of respondents, in fact) feel confident they could demonstrate their duty holder requirements “very well”.

Rachel Davidson, BESA’s director of specialist knowledge, stated: “Four years after the Building Safety Act came into force, more firms are building the knowledge and behaviours needed for a safer built environment. This represents real progress. We’re now moving from raising awareness to helping firms meet the assurance challenge in demonstrating their competence and compliance in practice.”

Davidson added: “However, there’s a level of frustration about information overload, commercial pressures and clients who are ‘not on the same page’. There are still firms that are not engaging with the process at any level, but their numbers are shrinking.”

Client behaviour

Almost three-quarters of respondents (ie 74%) said they had not seen any significant change in client behaviour since the Building Safety Act came into force. While contractors and specialists are adapting their systems and processes, some respondents questioned whether or not client behaviours, procurement practices and understanding of their responsibilities were changing at the same pace.

One respondent observed: “This results in conflict as we resist. Ultimately, we’re commercially punished for standing our ground and doing the job properly.”

Earlier this year, the BESA produced its Client’s Guide to the Building Safety Act. This document simplifies and explains client responsibilities under the Act of Parliament and focuses on the practical implications.

Micro business adaptation

According to the new BESA survey, smaller firms continue to adapt more slowly to the new safety regime. One-in-five respondents from micro and smaller organisations (21%) admitted they had made no significant changes, compared with just 5% of medium and large-scale operations.

One-in-three respondents to the survey said that one of the biggest challenges is demonstrating competence in practice, stressing the very real difference between holding a qualification and actually being able to do the work. 40% noted that competence issues are identified “frequently or occasionally”.

Historic compliance is a “ticking time bomb” according to some respondents, with only 30% suggesting they feel confident they could provide evidence of competence and compliance in projects carried out more than ten years ago.

Similarly, it’s hard to nail down evidence of supply chain competence with around one-in-three respondents reporting “challenges” in demonstrating the necessary assurance across those whom they appoint.

*Copies of the BESA Building Safety Act Industry Report 2026 can be downloaded at www.thebesa.com

Acting on behalf of the East Sussex Fire Authority, East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service has successfully prosecuted Gareth Reed and his company, Riverstone-Abbey Estate Agents Limited. At Brighton Magistrates’ Court on 12 October, Reed was fined £12,500 and ordered to pay a £2,000 statutory victim surcharge, while his company was fined £7,500.

In addition, Reed was ordered to pay £2,525.31 to East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service towards the costs of the investigation.

The prosecution follows a fire that occurred in Hughenden Road, Hastings on 15 May 2025 at a property then managed by Reed and his company. Three individuals suffered smoke inhalation after residents became trapped inside the premises as smoke filled the common areas and obstructed their escape.

Fire safety deficiencies identified

Following the fire, fire safety inspecting officers from the East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service attended the premises and identified significant fire safety deficiencies. Among those deficiencies were the following: 

*a fire detector that didn’t appear to be secured in its intended position on the kitchen ceiling 

*doors that were not fire-resisting and were not fitted with self-closing devices 

*a lack of evidence that residents had been provided with information about what to do in the event of a fire outbreak

Statutory powers under Article 27 of the Fire Safety Order enable authorised inspectors – where necessary to enforce fire safety legislation – to enter and inspect premises, make enquiries and require relevant documentation to be provided. These powers help to determine whether premises are being managed safely and whether those responsible are complying with their legal duties.

Brighton Magistrates’ Court heard that Reed (the sole director of Riverstone-Abbey Estate Agents Limited) had failed, without reasonable excuse, to provide the documents and information required.

Clear message

The message is clear: official correspondence from the Fire and Rescue Service must not be ignored. Businesses, landlords, managing agents and those with fire safety responsibilities should ensure official correspondence is dealt with promptly and responded to within the required timeframe. If there’s any uncertainty or difficulty meeting a deadline, they should contact the inspector without delay.

A letter from the Fire and Rescue Service may be an important step in identifying and addressing risks posed to life. Reading it, acting on it and responding appropriately are essential steps in protecting occupants and ensuring compliance with fire safety legislation.

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 places legal duties on the ‘Responsible Person’ to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the safety of relevant persons from fire.

‘Responsible Persons’ should: 

*ensure a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment is in place and kept under review 

*implement and maintain appropriate fire safety measures 

*establish reliable arrangements for receiving and responding to official correspondence 

*never ignore letters, notices or requests for information from authorised fire safety inspectors 

*respond to lawful requests within the specified timeframe and contact the inspector promptly if clarification or additional time is needed

*ensure that anyone responsible for managing fire safety understands their legal duties and knows how to escalate official communications

Responding to correspondence

East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service station manager (legal and enforcement) Jake Kaye said: “Effective fire safety management is essential to reduce the likelihood of fire and to ensure that, should a fire occur, it can be detected quickly and occupants can escape safely.”

Kaye continued: “This case also highlights the importance of responding to official correspondence. Ignoring a letter or failing to respond to a lawful request for information is not a way in which to avoid scrutiny. It can lead to further enforcement action and prosecution.”

In addition, Kaye stated: “We hope this prosecution and the penalties imposed by Brighton Magistrates’ Court serve as a clear reminder that fire safety responsibilities must be taken seriously and that lawful requests from authorised inspectors must be dealt with promptly.”

George O’Reilly (East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service’s assistant director of risk reduction) explained: “I would like to thank Brighton Magistrates’ Court for its careful consideration of this case, as well as our legal team and fire safety officers for their professionalism.”

O’Reilly went on to comment: “Official correspondence from East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service must not be ignored. We will always seek to work constructively with businesses and ‘Responsible Persons’ to help them understand and meet their fire safety responsibilities. However, this doesn’t remove the obligation to co-operate with authorised inspectors and comply with lawful requirements made during an investigation.”

In conclusion, O’Reilly informed Fire Safety Matters: “East Sussex Fire and Rescue Service has a statutory duty to enforce the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. We take that responsibility very seriously indeed. Where failures to comply with fire safety legislation occur, we will consider proportionate enforcement action. This prosecution demonstrates that we will use the powers available to us where necessary to uphold fire safety standards and protect members of the public.”

*Further information is available online at www.esfrs.org

Organised by Western Business Media Ltd, the Fire and Security Matters Awards enjoyed a record number of 430-plus entries in 2026 for their fifth iteration, while upwards of 860 guests attended the ‘sold out’ awards ceremony held at the Coventry Building Society (CBS) Arena on the evening of 2 July.

In 2027, the Fire and Security Matters Awards are once again free to enter and duly recognise excellence and innovation in the fire and security sectors.

Our sponsors also include Apollo Fire Detectors, C-TEC, Gerda Security Products, Keri Systems and Suprema Systems UK.

The Fire Industry Association, the Institute of Fire Safety Managers, the National Security Inspectorate and the Security Systems and Alarms Inspection Board are among our industry supporters.

The winners of the Fire and Security Matters Awards 2027 will be revealed at a gala black-tie dinner and ceremony to be held at the CBS Arena on 1 July.

It only takes a few minutes of your time to enter the Fire and Security Matters Awards. This is the perfect way in which to gain much-deserved recognition for either yourself, your team, a colleague, your organisation, a product/service or a specific project.

Enter online NOW!

Watch the highlights video from the Fire and Security Matters Awards 2026...

Categories in 2027

The list of categories for 2027 is as follows:

Fire categories

*Fire Safety Innovation of the Year

*Fire Safety Training Company of the Year

*Fire Safety Manufacturer of the Year

*Fire Safety Installation Company of the Year

*Fire Safety Project of the Year

*Fire Safety Manager of the Year

*Fire Safety Team of the Year

*Fire Industry Woman of the Year

*Fire Safety Consultancy of the Year

Security categories

*Security Innovation of the Year

*Security Training Company of the Year

*Security Manufacturer of the Year

*Security Installation Company of the Year

*Security Project of the Year

*Security/Risk Manager of the Year

*Security Guarding Company of the Year

*Security Team of the Year

*Security Industry Woman of the Year

*Security Consultancy of the Year

Joint Fire and Security categories

*ESG Company of the Year

*Distributor of the Year

*Commercial Team of the Year

*Customer Service Award

*Unsung Hero of the Year Award

*Rising Star of the Year Award

As always, there’s also going to be the prestigious Lifetime Achievement Award, the recipient of which will be chosen by the members of the independent Judging Panel.

Deadline for entries

*The deadline for entries is 16 April 2027 at 23.55 pm

**Click here to submit your entry/entries!

***Further information about the Fire and Security Matters Awards 2027 is available online