|
|
Brian Sims
Editor |
| Home> | Fire | >Alarms and Detection | >Regulator of Social Housing publishes first C4 grading for London Borough of Newham |
| Home> | Fire | >Fire and Rescue | >Regulator of Social Housing publishes first C4 grading for London Borough of Newham |
| Home> | Fire | >Fire Doors | >Regulator of Social Housing publishes first C4 grading for London Borough of Newham |
Regulator of Social Housing publishes first C4 grading for London Borough of Newham
21 October 2024
DURING AN inspection of the London Borough of Newham, the Regulator of Social Housing found upwards of 9,000 overdue fire safety remedial actions, of which more than 8,000 were overdue by 12 months or more, with upwards of 4,000 categorised as high risk.

Further, 40% of the London Borough of Newham’s 16,000 homes had not had an electrical condition test for more than 11 years. There’s a lack of evidence that the London Borough is meeting the smoke and carbon monoxide alarm requirements for any of its homes.
In addition, there’s a lack of accurate information on stock quality, with 60% of the London Borough of Newham’s homes without a survey within the last five years. At least 20% of its homes do not meet the requirements of the Decent Homes Standard.
On top of that, inspectors noted circa 5,400 open repairs, nearly half of which were overdue. Tenant Satisfaction Measure surveys have not been completed on time and there are “very limited meaningful opportunities” for tenants to influence and scrutinise the landlord’s strategies, policies and services.
Although the London Borough of Newham has indicated a willingness to address these issues, the Borough has failed to refer itself over key issues, while the Regulator of Social Housing has not yet seen sufficient evidence to assure itself of the London Borough’s ability to put matters right.
Unacceptable risk
Kate Dodsworth, chief of regulatory engagement at the Regulator of Social Housing, said: “The breadth and scale of these failings, including very serious Health and Safety-related issues, pose an unacceptable risk to tenants’ well-being. Taking accountability is a critical part of the co-regulatory approach and it’s extremely concerning that, despite the gravity of these failings, the landlord failed to refer itself to us over key issues.”
Dodsworth added: “We are now engaging intensively with the London Borough of Newham as it works to resolve these issues. While we are not proposing to use our enforcement powers at this stage, the situation will be kept under review.”
The Regulator of Social Housing has awarded 35 consumer grades since its new proactive consumer regime began in April, including nine C1 grades (the highest grade), 13 C2 grades, 12 C3 grades (of which ten were self-referrals) and one at the C4 level (ie the lowest grade).
The Regulator of Social Housing is carrying out planned inspections of all large social landlords (those with over 1,000 homes) over a four-year cycle. It has started to publish the outcomes of these first inspections and will continue to do so over the coming months.
- Cyber criminals exploit coronvirus fears
- NFU Mutual urges commercial property owners to maintain fire safety regimes
- Association for Specialist Fire Protection appoints Steve Davies as next CEO
- Firefighters in West Midlands region begin moving Coronavirus bodies
- Four new sector Best Practice ‘toolkits’ introduced by NFCC
- My Support Space introduced online for victims of crime in London
- Police investigate Grenfell 'stay put' policy
- Police Scotland and the SIA bring private security staff together
- National Fire Chiefs Council chair marks fifth anniversary of Grenfell tragedy
- Increase in deliberate fires during summer months









