NFCC issues opinion paper on design of new high-rise residential buildings

Among the considerations set out in the NFCC’s opinion paper are the following:

*Stairways are independent from each other and, therefore, a single fire cannot impact upon multiple escape routes

*Safe egress is provided for all building users, including those who either would not be able to, or would otherwise find it difficult to descend stairs

*Suitable resilience and flexibility must be provided for firefighting. This should include appropriate access and facilities, with sufficient resilience and redundancy built into the design

Last July, the Government announced proposals to make it a requirement for all new high-rise residential buildings over 18 metres in height to have a minimum of two staircases. This followed representations from across the fire sector and the building industry, with input provided by the NFCC.

The proposals will come into effect when the Government amends its statutory guidance. For their part, developers have been granted a 30-month transition period during which time they will be given a choice between following the new and existing guidance.

Some Fire and Rescue Services have said they are already being directly approached by building designers seeking advice on multiple escape routes. The NFCC’s opinion paper has sought to give clarity and consistency on the firefighting considerations that should be implemented when designing means of escape in new high-rise residential buildings.

Clear view

Gavin Tomlinson, chair of the NFCC’s Protection Committee, explained: “We want to be sure these buildings are safe places in which to live. The NFCC is wholly committed to supporting Fire and Rescue Services as they take on these new checks.”

Tomlinson added: “We are expecting Government to issue new guidance shortly, but we have a clear view of what we think are the key priorities for Fire and Rescue Service colleagues when reviewing the design of new high-rise residential buildings.”

Further, Tomlinson noted: “What we’re proposing is common sense, such as making sure that stairways are independent from one another so that a fire does not impact on multiple exit routes, making sure there are safe routes of escape for those individuals with additional needs and ensuring firefighters have the appropriate access and facilities. This is what we are advocating for in our discussions with partners in Government.”

*Download copies of the ‘Provision of Multiple Routes for the Evacuation of Residential Buildings’ opinion paper by visiting the NFCC’s website