
![]() |
Brian Sims
Editor |
Home> | Fire | >Fire and Rescue | >Firefighters warn of unsafe cuts in Tyne and Wear |
Firefighters warn of unsafe cuts in Tyne and Wear
13 November 2018
FIREFIGHTERS EXPRESSED both shock and anger at the announcement from Tyne and Wear Fire and Rescue Authority (TWFRA) that due to government cuts to the tune of £3.6m they intend to make further cuts to an already dangerously depleted service.

At a fire authority meeting this week they agreed to a public consultation on three proposals that would significantly change the current operational response model. The proposals include:
- The downgrading of wholetime availability at Hebburn and Wallsend to on-call (retained, part time) system with up to a 30 minute delay between the hours of 2000hrs-0800hrs.
- The reduction in available fire appliances at Tynemouth and South Shields between the hours of 2000hrs-0800hrs due to the need to provide fire cover for Wallsend and Hebburn.
- Reduction of two fire appliances one each from Gosforth and Washington by relocating them to Newcastle and Sunderland central.
- Downgrading an immediate response wholetime appliance at North Moor, Sunderland to an on-call (retained, part time) with a delayed response.
North East chair of the Fire Brigades Union Russ King said, “If these proposals go ahead, it will make the communities of Tyne and Wear less safe than they currently are. At the end of the day it’s not rocket science, it’s all about speed of response and weight of attack, the quicker our response with the appropriate number of staff, the more effective we can be.
“The proposed measures do nothing to improve public safety, in fact they make it worse, not only increasing community risk, but endangering firefighter safety. The reality is, there will be less immediate response, from a decreased number of immediately available fire engines, by a decreased workforce, over a greater area of the authority than before. The people of Tyne and Wear deserve better. Authority members need to be upfront about this with the public, they should openly acknowledge that the integrated risk management plan (IRMP) is not being implemented as it was originally intended due to the austerity measures of both current and previous governments”.
- Fire and Rescue Services stress pandemic is “no excuse for ignoring fire safety”
- Fire at Camden nightclub Koko
- “Slow progress in fighting fraud gives way to new wave of COVID-driven risks” reports Fraud Advisory Panel
- “Abusive behaviour towards firefighters must stop” urges LFB Deputy Commissioner
- Legal challenge on Police use of facial recognition cameras
- Uncertainty continues as Fire and Rescue Service steps up to combat COVID-19
- Police investigate Grenfell 'stay put' policy
- Fire Safety North returns to Manchester
- Firefighters call for Grenfell Tower Inquiry to investigate “revolving door” between manufacturers and regulators
- Onwatch Multifire sold through pre-pack administration deal
- State of the Union
- Government outlines fire service reforms
- From the editor
- Fire safety returns home to NEC Birmingham
- Blog for FSM website
- Cigarette fires on the rise
- Union outrage at 'obscene' pay rises
- State of the Union
- Fire safety on the agenda in Scotland
- Major fire at Worcester hub of home delivery firm