|
|
Brian Sims
Editor |
| Home> | Fire | >Fire and Rescue | >Firefighters warn of unsafe cuts in Tyne and Wear |
Firefighters warn of unsafe cuts in Tyne and Wear
13 November 2018
FIREFIGHTERS EXPRESSED both shock and anger at the announcement from Tyne and Wear Fire and Rescue Authority (TWFRA) that due to government cuts to the tune of £3.6m they intend to make further cuts to an already dangerously depleted service.
At a fire authority meeting this week they agreed to a public consultation on three proposals that would significantly change the current operational response model. The proposals include:
- The downgrading of wholetime availability at Hebburn and Wallsend to on-call (retained, part time) system with up to a 30 minute delay between the hours of 2000hrs-0800hrs.
- The reduction in available fire appliances at Tynemouth and South Shields between the hours of 2000hrs-0800hrs due to the need to provide fire cover for Wallsend and Hebburn.
- Reduction of two fire appliances one each from Gosforth and Washington by relocating them to Newcastle and Sunderland central.
- Downgrading an immediate response wholetime appliance at North Moor, Sunderland to an on-call (retained, part time) with a delayed response.
North East chair of the Fire Brigades Union Russ King said, “If these proposals go ahead, it will make the communities of Tyne and Wear less safe than they currently are. At the end of the day it’s not rocket science, it’s all about speed of response and weight of attack, the quicker our response with the appropriate number of staff, the more effective we can be.
“The proposed measures do nothing to improve public safety, in fact they make it worse, not only increasing community risk, but endangering firefighter safety. The reality is, there will be less immediate response, from a decreased number of immediately available fire engines, by a decreased workforce, over a greater area of the authority than before. The people of Tyne and Wear deserve better. Authority members need to be upfront about this with the public, they should openly acknowledge that the integrated risk management plan (IRMP) is not being implemented as it was originally intended due to the austerity measures of both current and previous governments”.
- Removing the Obscurity Behind Sheltered Housing Fire Standards
- Proposed fire inspector numbers are “gross underestimate” of building safety crisis
- Fire Safety First: Making Premises Fire Safety Compliant
- Fire Safety Matters launches Ignite CPD webinar platform
- CHAS makes it quick and easy to find COVID-19 secure contractors
- Report says government deregulation responsible for Grenfell
- Service leads on road safety campaign
- Latest edition of BS 5266-1 issued by British Standards Institution
- Building Safety Bill presents “opportunity to make all buildings resilient to fire”
- NFCC calls for additional Government action to combat extreme weather events
- State of the Union
- Government outlines fire service reforms
- From the editor
- Fire safety returns home to NEC Birmingham
- Blog for FSM website
- Cigarette fires on the rise
- Union outrage at 'obscene' pay rises
- State of the Union
- Fire safety on the agenda in Scotland
- Major fire at Worcester hub of home delivery firm









