|
|
Brian Sims
Editor |
| Home> | Fire | >Fire and Rescue | >Judicial review granted over firefighter shift patterns |
Judicial review granted over firefighter shift patterns
20 November 2017
FIREFIGHTERS HAVE won the right to legally challenge shift patterns that could see firefighters on duty for 98 hours straight.
The High Court has made the decision to allow a judicial review early in 2018 into the shift pattern, which was set to be introduced by South Yorkshire Fire Authority.
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU), who sought the review, welcomed the court’s decision. It claims these long shifts, known as the ‘close proximity crewing’ or CPC system, pose a threat to safety due to an increased risk of fatigue due to being on duty for such a lengthy period.
The case was taken to the high court after South Yorkshire Fire Authority included the problematic shift system in its three year ‘risk management plan’, in spite of having been vigorously challenged by the FBU since 2012, and the shift system having being slammed in an Employment Tribunal in December 2015. It is also in breach of both European and UK law.
FBU assistant general secretary Andy Dark said: “If these duty systems continue to be utilised by Fire and Rescue Services, tragic consequences are almost inevitable. It is impossible to imagine how any fire and rescue service can reasonably argue that they can give any assurance that a firefighter on such a duty system would be in a fit state to face the strain, stress and physical demands at a highly challenging incident, an extreme example being that faced by the firefighters who responded to the Grenfell Tower fire. Or the protracted call outs we experience all too regularly when there is serious flooding, when both the physical and mental demands of the job can really take their toll.
“We are relieved to know that we now have the green light to seek a high court ruling on this worrying matter. It is a source of acute frustration that, in the absence of a collective agreement, a public body has chosen to blatantly disregard a clear Employment Tribunal ruling, and to maintain a system of working which places both public and firefighters at significant risk.”
- Government reveals cladding action plan
- Fire safety focus “must go further than cladding” asserts Wrexham Mineral Cables
- London Fire Brigade supports Government’s dual staircase proposals
- ASFP issues response to CITB’s consultation on ‘Understanding Fire in Buildings’ training standard
- Fire Safety Matters Podcast – Episode 27
- NFCC succeeds in Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) amendment bid
- Disabled duo given go-ahead to challenge ministers on post-Grenfell evacuation
- Showtime Security director given prison sentence
- Barnard appointed Security Institute director
- Cifas enters partnership with leading data science specialist Mango Solutions
- State of the Union
- Government outlines fire service reforms
- From the editor
- Fire safety returns home to NEC Birmingham
- Blog for FSM website
- Cigarette fires on the rise
- Union outrage at 'obscene' pay rises
- State of the Union
- Fire safety on the agenda in Scotland
- Major fire at Worcester hub of home delivery firm









